|
|
The Great
Lakes coast comprises a variety of shore types that range from
low-lying coastal marshes subject to flooding to high rock cliffs
that are resistant to erosion. Most of the coast, however, is
composed of erodible glacially deposited sand, gravel, clay, and a
claylike material called till.
On the coast, the
forces of erosion are embodied in waves, currents, and wind.
Surface-water and groundwater flow and freeze-thaw cycles might also
play a role.
|
The coastal Great Lakes
region is of glacial origin, and it has a variety of general shore
types: high and low rocky bluffs, low floodplains and coastal
marshes, high and low sand/till bluffs, sand dunes, and artificial
coastlines. Of the erodible shore types, the two most common are
sand/till bluffs and sand dunes. |
 |
|
A washout of a bluff
along Lake Michigan. |
The sand/till bluff
shore type is most often characterized by an underlayer of a less
erodible, more compact material, such as clay or glacial till,
overlaid by more erodible, less compact material, such as sand and
gravel. Layers of till or clay might also be present in the
overlayer. Because of the presence of the compact underlayer, these
shore types have been referred to as "cohesive coasts." Because of
the variation in depositional environments, the composition and
erodibility of cohesive coasts might vary considerably over
distances as short as several hundred yards.
The sand dune shore
type generally comprises glacially deposited sands and gravels that
have been reformed by winds. Although there are dune shore types
that consist entirely of sand, very often the dunes sit atop an
underlayer of glacial till. The erodibility of this shore type can
be more similar to a cohesive coast than to a dune shore type made
up entirely of sand.
This
figure presents a cross-section view of a typical beach profile.
Erosion occurs within an area roughly from the bluff crest out into
the nearshore to a water depth of about 30 ft. For erodible sand
dune and cohesive coasts, the erosion rate within that area would
continue at about the same rate, when averaged over the long term,
even though erosion at a specific location in that area, such as the
bluff, might increase or decrease, at least over the short term.
Both sandy and cohesive coasts might partially recover from erosion.
The beach might enlarge and small dunes begin to form at the base of
the bluff. Over the long term, however, bluff erosion of these shore
types is irreversible, as only a portion of the eroded sand ever
returns to the beach. There are a few shore types that exhibit
sensitivity to changes in water levels, such as those with an
erosion-resistant shallow offshore shelf, but they are not common on
the Great Lakes coast.
|
|
The most dramatic
erosion often occurs during storms, partially because the
highest-energy waves are generated under storm conditions. Added to
this, storms often produce short-term shifts in lake levels as water
is pushed from one side of a lake to the other, called "setup." The
effect of storms is also influenced by their duration and return
frequency.
| "Wave climate"
describes the wave characteristics that prevail in a particular
region. From hour to hour, day to day, and season to season, wave
conditions can vary significantly. When averaged over longer periods
of years and decades, however, both weather and wave climate remain
about the same. As a result, because waves are the primary erosion
agent, erosion and recession rates will also remain about the same
when averaged over longer periods. Because water depth
partially influences how and where waves will interact with the
coastal area, lake levels might have an influence on coastal
erosion, though they do not cause it.
Naturally fluctuate in response to changing water
supplies and weather conditions.
|
 |
|
The devasting impact of
recession and erosion on properties along the Lake
Michigan coast |
Erosion is part of a
larger process known as littoral transport, the movement of
material by waves and currents on the coastline. The material being
transported is primarily sand and gravel, with a small percentage of
silt-size particles and rocks. The source or supply of nearly all of
the sand that is in the littoral transport system of the Great Lakes
is from the erosion of the bluffs and dunes. Rivers supply very
little material.
Littoral transport
occurs along the shoreline as well as into the lake and onto the
shore. With respect to sand supply, a given length of coastline
might have a surplus, be in balance, or have a deficit in its
sand-supply budget. A sand supply would be in balance for a
particular area if the amount of sand leaving the area was being
replaced by an equal amount of sand arriving from adjoining areas.
Over short time periods, erosion might be followed by a buildup of
sand (accretion), but over the long term, the area would be in a
state of dynamic equilibrium. A large reduction in the sand supply,
or a long-term reduction in supply to an area, creates a deficit in
the sand budget that must be balanced, usually by increased erosion.
Sand supply influences
erosion by providing the material that builds and maintains beaches,
offshore bars, and the general beach profile. These features
dissipate wave energy, and the absence of these features - where
they would normally be present - usually results in increased
erosion.
Human activity can
significantly affect sand supply. Coastal navigation and shore
protection structures can adversely affect sand supply and the
transport of sand along the coastline. Groins and harbor structures
in particular might interfere with the transport of sand along the
coastline. Sea walls or revetments might cut off the littoral
transport system from its sand source. Individually, the effects of
one or several structures might or might not be noticeable, but the
cumulative effect of hundreds of such structures can be significant.
Dredging operations might hinder or benefit littoral transport and
the sand supply.
In addition to the more
obvious adverse consequences associated with narrower beaches,
interruptions in sand supply have a significant impact on the sand
dune and cohesive shore types that make up most of the erodible
coastline of the Great Lakes. For sand dune shore types, a reduction
in sand supply to an area is generally accompanied by an increase in
erosion. This usually occurs to the bluff, the primary sand source.
The same is true for cohesive coasts; however, in the case of
cohesive coasts, there is an additional effect. Either permanent or
temporary loss of sand cover in the nearshore might expose the
underlying till to erosion. Since the erosion of till contributes
very little sand to the littoral transport system, the erosion
process is considered irreversible for cohesive coasts. The coastal
area attempts to adjust to the erosion that occurs in the nearshore,
with the erosion gradually progressing to the beach and bluff in a
process termed profile adjustment. This adjustment process
might take years or decades to complete. If the interruption in
sediment supply is severe enough or if the sediment shortage cannot
be made up, the coastal area might never fully adjust and erosion
might increase significantly.
Human activities can
benefit the sand supply. At many of the large harbors around the
Great Lakes, the adverse effect of the large navigation structures
on the sand supply has, at least for the last decade or so, been
mitigated by the beach nourishment programs at those harbors. Beach
nourishment reintroduces sand into the littoral transport system
that has been blocked by the navigation structures, thus maintaining
a balance in the supply.
Erosion and
Recession
The terms erosion
and recession are often used interchangeably. However,
recession is the landward movement of a feature, such as an
elevation contour or the bluff or dune crest, while erosion is the
wearing away of land. Recession is expressed as a distance or a
change in distance, while erosion is expressed as a volume or a
change in volume. Recession can be thought of as a consequence of
erosion. To that extent it is reflective of bluff erosion. In
addition, bluff recession might be reflective of coastal erosion
processes as a whole, if averaged over a sufficiently long period.
Bluff recession is the
most visible aspect of coastal erosion and receives the most
attention. However, using only bluff recession as an indicator of
erosion rates or erosion trends might be misleading because of the
length of time, or lag, that usually occurs between erosion and
bluff recession. Coastal erosion occurs over the area roughly from
the top of the bluff out into the nearshore region to about the
30-ft. water depth. As a result, erosion processes (particularly
those that occur to the nearshore lake bottom) often do not become
apparent as bluff erosion or bluff recession until days, weeks,
months, or even years have passed. In addition, erosion,
particularly bluff erosion and recession, do not occur at a constant
rate. Over relatively short time periods of days, weeks, and months,
the rate of erosion and recession might vary greatly. It is very
common for a reach of coastline to have no bluff recession for
months or years and then experience severe bluff recession over a
period of days or weeks. This bluff recession might occur during a
period of little or no storm activity.
It is not possible to
precisely determine the relationship between any of the erosion
forces, or a single factor influencing erosion, and the bluff
recession rate, particularly over short time periods. It is
generally possible only to correlate a cause-and-effect relationship
among all the erosion forces and factors influencing erosion, taken
as a whole, to the bluff recession rate averaged over a period of
many years or decades. The rates of recession thus derived are
referred to as long-term, average, bluff recession rates.
Source: US Army
Corps of Engineers |